idon'tdenydesignhereismoreopenthanTaiwan.
Butwhichoneisbetter?
Worksforcompetitioncan'tpresentdesigner'sthinking?
Rightcompetitionsomehowlimitsdesigners.
Isn'tdesign?
Isn'tdesigner'sthinking?
Doesn'titpresentadesigner?
ireallywonderthesequestions.
Whydon'twedoboth?
Somepeopledislike"masters"or"famousdesigners"
becausetheirworksalwayskeepthesamestyleneverchange.
Butiloveallgreatobjectilovecriticaldesignfunctionaldesignetc.
iloveDroogPhilippeStarckNaotoFukasawaKarimRashidMarcNewson.
"Design"isdesign.
Whyshouldwelabelit?




































i don't deny design here is more open than Taiwan.
But which one is better?
Works for competition can't present designer's thinking?
Right competition somehow limits designers.
Isn't design?
Isn't designer's thinking?
Doesn't it present a designer?
i really wonder these questions.
Why don't we do both?
Some people dislike "masters" or "famous designers"
Because their works always keep the same style never change.
But i love all great works, i love critical design, functional design etc.
i love Droog, Philippe Starck, Naoto Fukasawa, Karim Rashid, Marc Newson.
"Design" is design.
Why should we label it?

arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜

    sushichao 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()